My Images are not being indexed on Google Images

Hello,

I published my website www.humanhedges.com at the beginning of July 2026.

A quick check on Google Images - typing site:humanhedges.com into Google Images - shows that they have only indexed two of my images (and frustratingly a load of my client’s logos).

What can I do to make sure my images are being seen and indexed by Google images? It is very important to me as a maker/creator that my gallery images can be indexed properly.

Is it true that the sitejet Gallery element might be the issue? Somehow blocking the Googlebots from seeing the images properly?

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Yes — and at first glance, it can actually seem somewhat random. Google doesn’t simply work on the principle of “image on a website = image in Google Images.” There are several stages involved: Google first has to discover the image, crawl it, associate it with the page, index it, and then decide whether it is relevant enough for a particular search query.

Especially on image-heavy websites, this means that images can appear in Google Images today and disappear again later.

The most important factors

1. Google has to be able to crawl the image in the first place

This may sound obvious, but it is actually one of the most common technical issues. Google still recommends embedding images as a standard

<img src="...">

element. In 2026, Google also explicitly clarified that the src attribute of the img element is the key source for extracting images.

Potential problems include:

  • Images that are loaded only through JavaScript
  • Images used only as CSS backgrounds
  • Images inside galleries that only appear after clicking
  • data-src being used instead of src
  • Images being blocked by cookie/consent systems
  • Temporary or frequently changing image URLs

2. Google needs to be able to understand the context of the image

Google doesn’t look at the image alone. It also considers the surrounding context:

  • alt text
  • File name
  • Image caption
  • Page heading
  • Surrounding text
  • Content of the page
  • Image URL
  • In some cases, structured data

An image called

IMG_5837.jpg

provides Google with much less information than

black-and-white-portrait-man.jpg.

That doesn’t mean you should artificially stuff keywords into file names and alt texts, though. Google primarily wants accurate descriptions.

3. The page itself needs to be meaningful to Google

This is a point that is often underestimated.

A great photograph on a thin or relatively irrelevant page has a lower chance of being displayed than the same photograph on a page whose content clearly explains why that image is there.

Google is therefore increasingly trying to understand the relationship between:

Image ↔ Page ↔ Search Intent

4. Google can remove images from the visible results

This is probably what you are observing.

Google Images is not a static catalogue. An image may appear for a particular search today and no longer appear later. That does not necessarily mean that Google has “deleted” or de-indexed the image.

It may simply mean that Google now considers other images more relevant for that particular search query.

This is an important distinction:

“No longer visible in Google Images” ≠ “no longer indexed.”

Particularly interesting: Image URLs and canonicalization

If the same image is accessible under several different URLs, for example:

/images/photo.jpg

/uploads/photo.jpg

/gallery/photo.jpg

Google may try to recognize and consolidate these different versions.

Google also uses canonicalization for web pages to determine which version of similar or identical URLs it considers the preferred one. Even a rel="canonical" that you specify yourself is ultimately only a signal to Google, not an absolute instruction.

This can be particularly relevant for websites with large or dynamically generated galleries.

Thank you Frank for this very detailed and interesting reply.

May I ask do Sitejet’s galleries rely on Javascript?

Hi Livingstatuecompany

Can I give my thoughts on your website landing page?

I do love the ‘living’ hedges and wondering have you tested placing your video first instead of a static image?

When I visited your website, I had no idea what was happening in the image.

Even the ‘Not your average greenery’ title and paragraph on the left of screen, didn’t clear things up.

So scrolling and seeing the video, it clicked what was happening in the image above.

My feedback is:

Try a swap around with replacing the video where the image is and the image where the video is then watch your retention and bounce rate stats for approx one week or month. Your new stats may surprise you. You can always swap back if stats stay the same or drops.

Of course, if you are content with how the website landing page is currently performing , you can ignore this comment!

I have thick skin and so won’t be offended.:grinning_face:

Using the search on the upper right, I found discussions regarding javascript.

I didn’t go through all, however, you many find the answer you seek on those threads if you do the same or open a Support Ticket if unsuccessful.:grinning_face:

As far as I can see: Galleries do not use JS, unless you activate lazyload or any sort of animation like “enlarge on click”. We do have a filterable gallery that uses JS of course.

Hope this helps :slight_smile: