Hi @Andre,
The context of my statement for website success is specifically for migrations. SEO losses occur if we migrate websites that do not use www to Sitejet, as they will be forced to use www,
Newer websites primarily do not use the www subdomain.
As evidenced by the parent of Sitejet company: https://webpros.com/ (no www)
And Sitejet’s newer competitors, such as Webflow.
So, if https://webpros.com/ were to migrate to sitejet, they’d have to change their URL structure to https://www.webpros.com/ and apply 301s to all the URLs. They’d then lose the full strength of their backlinks at this moment as they all point to a non-www URL. Examples provided.
I explained this issue with supporting links here.
I provided evidence as to why using 301s is not an appropriate solution, as it doesn’t pass over all the SEO equity here.
I provided all these 3rd party references and clarification a year ago, and there’s been no change or updates on the non-www matter; that is why I’ve commented.
Commercially, Sitejet is removing itself from consideration for anyone with a non-www website looking for a CMS. How that revenue threat to Sitejet isn’t being addressed is baffling!!
When users have taken the time to give supporting evidence for numerous years with no changes or updates, we can’t help but wonder if Sitejet is making decisions to reduce its resources, which makes it less attractive.
I’m not the only one wondering this, as seen in the question from @Tom_Auterman.
@Andre, my frustrations are not with you, but at Sitejet, you’ve always been helpful and responsive. Thanks for your replies and efforts. Please keep pushing leadership to make the non-WWW and DKIM happen.