SiteJet's SEObilities / page speed, unused JavaScript, etc

[Andre]

Hey @Daniel_Kaesmacher - moved this to the helpdesk for this topic. I like to give you some insight and point you to a few threads we had about this topic already.

Aside from that, this can also be a case by case / website to website situation. If you like, I am happy to check on one or two specific websites for you to give you some feedback.

Lucian gave a great insight to Lighthouse/Pagespeed:

Lighthouse / PageSpeed - Unused JavaScript

Hi! While there is always room for tweaks and performance improvements, this can be an extensive topic. The scores that Google (Lighthouse or PagesSpeed) gives doesn’t really mean anything (if it’s something good or bad). Mostly they are some conventions/metrics to compile a set of recommendations. That being said, not even Google is getting high scores (especially on mobile), see for yourself: Google Bussiness Page Google (Pixel) Store Google Workspace P.S. I’ve tried to include these link…

And a view from our CTO on this matter:

Lighthouse / PageSpeed - Unused JavaScript

As was already said in this thread, the suggestions given by the tools are just best practice suggestions and don’t necessarily have to have a high impact on the actual score. The JS is bundled and minified so it’s downloaded in one piece. It’s not larger than a single regular image and is even downloaded after the content has already been rendered (<script> tags are embedded before the closing </body> tag). So even if we removed most of the JS it would probably only have a very tiny effect on …

And some more ideas:

Yoga Template - Very slow site via GTMetrix

Hi! I’ve done a test also with the Yoga template. I’ve removed the blur effect from the main 2 bubbles (on the top)…and now I’m getting a Grade A. See results here. [image] The test website: http://1ed24f-55873.preview.sitejet.io/ I’m not able to get a lower score … so I can’t reproduce your issue. The unused JS hint was discussed here: Unused javascript / CSS (google pagespeed) This Template, in particular, is heavy on images… and you can see this in the page details section [image] S…

Looking forward to your feedback!