Unused javascript / CSS (google pagespeed)

[Andre]

Hi there @Barbara_Bichler ,

hope you are doing okay Well, if you have no experience in code I strongly advise against removing code yourself. However, I am sure the community here will help out, if you need any help.

60 is not really THAT bad and I see Google page speed more like a guideline or benchmark @Lucian_Dinu actually gave a great answer about that here:

Lighthouse / PageSpeed - Unused JavaScript

Dears, when checking with Google (Lighthouse or PagesSpeed), I get proposal to reduce unused JS on most of the websites I bult with Sitejet. Is this typical for a website builder in general, or for Sitejet, or am I doing something inefficient myself? Any of you encountered the same problem? kind regards Mark

@malte also gave an insight to this topic:

Lighthouse / PageSpeed - Unused JavaScript

As was already said in this thread, the suggestions given by the tools are just best practice suggestions and don’t necessarily have to have a high impact on the actual score. The JS is bundled and minified so it’s downloaded in one piece. It’s not larger than a single regular image and is even downloaded after the content has already been rendered (<script> tags are embedded before the closing </body> tag). So even if we removed most of the JS it would probably only have a very tiny effect on …

If you like, please give us the link to your website, and we have a look with you.

Second question: If you do not use Photoshop e.g. you could probably use any free converter that you find via a search. Like this one here: WEBP Converter | CloudConvert

Tried that one and did not have any issue yet.